retirement, annuities, long term care, pensions on divorce
 
 
find answers to pension and pension on divorce problems  
search this site
  Annuities
  annuity rates
  annuity quotes
  pension annuity
  open market option
  with profit annuities
  smoker annuities
  diabetes annuity
  impaired health
  long term care
  immediate needs
  purchased life annuity
  Pensions
  pension simplification
  employer pensions
  private pensions
  state pensions
  other pension benefits
  pensions in retirement
  leaving service
  corporate benefits
  director SSAS
  salary sacrifice
  income drawdown
  drawdown rates
  Divorce
  marriage breakdown
  divorce proceedings
  ancillary relief
  step-by-step guide
  assets on divorce
  pension on divorce
  pension analysis
  CETV valuations
  pensions valuation
  £25 Actuarial Report
  £50 Uniformed Report
  pension sharing
  case study
  earmarking
  Topics
  legislation
  your questions
  terms and conditions
  privacy policy
 
home | about us | our services | contact us | site map | links
 
case law

 

£25 Actuarial Report
  £25 Actuarial Report values a defined benefit scheme. It takes only 10 minutes online and gives you a 5-page report signed off by an accreted actuary click here  
  Pension values 30% greater than the CETV.
On divorce find out if the provider quote values the pensions fairly. Start here by comparing some valuation examples
 
 
Burrows v Burrows (1999)
 
The couple married in 1978, separated in 1994 and at the time of divorce they had two children. The matrimonial assets exceeded £1,000,000 in total value with the family home worth £400,000, the husband's interest in a company worth £275,000 and the husbands pension fund worth £265,000. The District Judge ordered the sale of the family home with £349,000 going to the wife with maintenance of £1,200 per month from the husband's income of £3,000 net per month.

There was also an earmarking order for half of the maximum possible tax free lump sum from the husband's pension and half of his annual pension income. The husband appealed against the earmarking order and this was allowed by the court against the pension income only, as per the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 73) stating that an even split between the parties was not appropriate.

 
  Bookmark with:
What are these?  
Add Bookmark  
  resources

 

caselaw pages   annuities
   
  private pensions   pensions in retirement
   
  employer pensions   pension terms
   
 
 
 
find out about your annuity and long term care options
 
retirement, pensions, annuities and long term care updates
please add your email below
subscribe
unsubscribe
index / glossary
 
 
 
 

Disclaimer: Information found on this site does not amount to financial advice or legal advice. Every time you access the website you agree to be bound by the Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree to be bound by them, you should not use the sharingpensions.co.uk website. Before taking any action regarding pensions, pension on divorce or any other financial or legal matter you should seek professional advice.

   
 
  Copyright©2001-08 Moneyengines.co.uk Ltd. All Rights Reserved terms and conditions